A Better Brake Test?
We all know that passing the MOT is only half the story when it comes to the condition of a vehicle’s brakes.
Seeping wheel cylinders, broken or stretched springs, thin brake linings and so on could all potentially result in brake failure – yet at the time of test, brake performance could be entirely satisfactory.
So could the MOT brake check be done better?
Safety
“No dismantling” is a golden rule of the MOT, but for brakes is that simply unacceptable if we are to have a meaningful ‘safety’ examination?
Just look at the most obvious and simplistic safety check on a hydraulic braking system – is there any brake fluid?
You must unscrew the petrol tank cap to inspect the seal…
 |
We all know the answer. If there’s not a transparent fluid reservoir, then you can’t remove the cap to look and check. Yet this is a nonsense when we are required to remove the petrol cap to check the seal. And this really is about safety, no fluid – no brakes!
Few people managing an MOT test and repair garage won’t have come across the classic MOT/service problem on brakes.
“Yes sir, your car did pass the MOT when you were here earlier before booking it in for a service, but after removing the brake drums we’ve found you need replacement wheel cylinders and brake shoes”… The customer isn’t happy: “but it passed the MOT!”
We all know the problem. Whatever the brake performance the wheel cylinders could be ‘weeping’ and about to fail, and the linings could be worn thin. An MOT brake check says little at all about the condition of the brakes.
Quirks and Inconsistencies
Some vehicles have transmission handbrakes. The Manual explains how to test these using roller brake test equipment. On the other hand using the brake rollers could, on some such vehicles, damage the transmission. So what to do? You just have to decide for yourself… but don’t forget that ‘advisory’ note – and if you do damage the vehicle’s systems, then that’s down to you, you will have to cough up!
…but you may not unscrew this one to inspect the brake fluid level, even if the container is not transparent, as shown here.
 |
You have been presented with a vehicle with a damaged tyre for Test. Aha! it says something about this in the Manual under ‘Brake Performance’.
After listing examples of vehicles which shouldn’t be Tested with a roller brake tester, it says “These vehicle should be Tested using a…decelerometer…”. Then, the next paragraph says “A roller brake test is also not appropriate for vehicles with damaged, under-inflated or studded tyres”.
So there it is, we must use a decelerometer.
No! If the tyres are damaged or under-inflated that is most likely to be “Grounds for refusal to carry out a Test” because the vehicle is “… not fit to be driven… ”, as laid down in the Guide. Yet the Manual could lead you to mistakenly believe a decelerometer test is required – potentially dangerous.
We raised this with VOSA’s John Saker at their Bristol HQ who said “you are the first person that has mentioned this, I feel this is because generally Testers are experienced enough to know when a tyre is or is not suitable to take on the road…”.
Review
It really is arguable that on the grounds of road safety, the methods recommended to MOT Test brakes should be reviewed. It may also be worth sacrificing that ‘no dismantling’ rule for the better protection of motorists against encountering ‘out of control’ vehicles because they have serious latent brake defects, which the current MOT Test cannot possibly detect.