| Author | Post |
|---|
Wesley
Trade Member
|
Posted: Wed May 21st, 2008 11:59 pm |
|
kev1975 wrote: Wesley wrote: Doin my bit, failure rate at 48% lol, no abnormal values.
my failure rate is somewhere around that as well , but i do some nasty old class 7 as well as a few bargain basement type sales cars 
That includes "55" plates requiring Discs and Pads! lol
|
kev1975
Trade Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 5th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 324 |
| Mana: |    |
|
Posted: Wed May 21st, 2008 07:30 pm |
|
Wesley wrote: Doin my bit, failure rate at 48% lol, no abnormal values.
my failure rate is somewhere around that as well , but i do some nasty old class 7 as well as a few bargain basement type sales cars
|
Wesley
Trade Member
|
Posted: Tue May 20th, 2008 11:09 pm |
|
| Doin my bit, failure rate at 48% lol, no abnormal values.
|
removalizer
Trade Member
| Joined: | Tue Feb 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 104 |
| Mana: | |
|
Posted: Sun May 11th, 2008 08:34 pm |
|
Just read the Society of Operations Engineers Magazine May 08 edition, apparently the figures for MOT failures requested in the Davidson review have now been published relating to tests between April 06 and March 2007, the test failure has risen from 28% (previous year) to 33% on Class 4 and even higher on Class 7. But a DFT spokesman has stated that the 4-2-2 system is still being proposed.
I would find it hard for the government to recommend 4-2-2 on these figures, having said that based on the their latest series of cock ups nothing would surprise me.
|
Current time is 01:46 pm | |
|
